Point to Point WiFi Antenna Extends WiFi Coverage Up to 3 Miles for Broadband Sharing
Wanted to have extend WiFi coverage beyond your home compound? Typically WiFi coverage range is meant for LAN (Local Area Network) usage but in case you need more than what it can achieve, then the newly released Point to Point WiFi antenna could be one of your great alternatives.
Without the need to run long cable that could be quite costly, the new antenna can transmit and receive wireless transmission with direct point-to-point protocol without significant signal-to-noise ratio loss. At reasonable size of 11.8-inch x 15.75-inch, it is claimed to be able to cover longer range as compared to other yagis antenna that could cost more and appear to be even bulkier than this solution. Best thing is, it has a very narrow beam width of 16 degrees and 21 degrees for horizontal and vertical transmission respectively suitable for a much concentrated directional transmission with less interference especially on surrounding wireless devices that are not the intended recipients. Rated at 15dBi, it is claimed to be able to cover up to three miles which is far more sufficient for practical usage. However, as similar to other Radio Frequency transmission, both the installation points ought to be in the line-of-sight for best and optimum performance.
Only one drawback, users will need multiple adapters/converters in order to convert the signal from radio frequency to normal networking port that can be plugged and used by normal PC. Priced at $89.95 (excluding Versa WiFi USB Adapter, RPSMA Male/Female Adapter), it is quite an affordable solution for broadband sharing over a long distance.
Related posts:
- Intel Tested WiMax Rural Connectivity Platform with 60 Miles Coverage
- New CDR-350 Router To Convert Cellular to WiFi Broadband Access
- NEC Wideband Wearable Antenna For Poor Reception Solution
- FON Collaboration with Joikusoft to Develop FonSpot that Transform 3G Mobile Phone to WiFi Access Point
- CradlePoint Unveiled Portable Router to Convert 3G to WiFi Broadband Access
The manager of Elmer's local whorehouse one night found, to his dismay, that he was short of Chinese girls for Elmer's scheduled evening's entertainment.
Thinking quickly, he dashed out and bought several inflatable fuck dolls, figuring that, given Elmer's obtuseness, he wouldn't know the difference.
Soon after, he ushered Elmer into a room that housed one of the new lovelies, assuring him that he was in for an especially good time.
When Elmer came out of the room a little while later, the manager was waiting eagerly in the hallway. He winked at Elmer and asked "Well? How'd you like her?"
"I just don't know what happened," said Elmer, shaking his head. "I bit her on the tit, she farted, and flew out the window."
i think this is one person, and a personal blog nothing more. Anyway, I googled wifi extender antenna what i found.
http://www.google.com/products?q=wifi+extender+an…
Yeah this greg guy writes a lot of stuff but he's right… where the fuck are manufacturer name and the links to their website?
Otherwise you're writing this shit for no reason, what do i do now i know about this amazing product….
What will it take, finally, for ALL of your writers to always, always, always — every time, without fail — remember to include such important things as THE NAME OF THE MANUFACTURER and ITS WEB SITE URL in all of your product articles?!?!?!?!
What, at long last, will it take?
THIS IS NOT JOURNALISM that you're doing, here. You may THINK it is, but it is not. Have any of you even actually BEEN to journalism school? Or taken a journalism course? OR EVEN READ A BOOK ABOUT JOURNALISM??!?! Have any of you ever even heard of the implicit rule of all articles of this type which says that ALL of the following things must always be answered in said types of articles: Who, what, when, where, why, how? Could you please just bother to READ A BOOK about journalism? An article, maybe? A blog posting? Something? Anything? Please? If you did, you'd realize what an egregeous thing you're doing with your articles which include either or both of no mention of the manufacturer, or a link to its web site. You do it all the time. It's outrageous… unconscionable. Shame.
We've all learned to tolerate that English is obviously not your first language (which isn't, in and of itself, a bad thing), and that you will not bother to get even remotely good at it before daring to write, commercially, in it (which is); but you cannot, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, be so reckless as to write articles (in ANY language) about things which do not include the absolute BASICS: Who, what, why, when, where and how! How are such articles useful, other than as mere curiosity, if you do not include the BASICS?
Hmmm?
GET A CLUE, for godsake! I've complained about this REPEATEDLY here. No one in your "organization" is paying attention. What is the problem? Are you all just oblivious… or aloof… or arrogant… or what?
Shame on you! I don't CARE that this posting is coming across as an over-the-top rant by a seemingly crazy person; and that it will be Google-able as that forever. I don't care. Nothing less that this seems to be getting your attention; and I'm under no illusion, in fact, that even THIS will get your attention. NOTHING, in fact, seems to get your attention.
So, again, shame on you for the complaint in chief of this posting; but shame on you even more for ignoring all the other times herein that I've written it.
Shame. On. You.
___________________________________
Gregg L. DesElms
Napa, California, USA
gregg at greggdeselms dot com