Apple Inc’s iPhones and iPod Touch Cannibalizing iPod Nano, Shuffle and Classic Series

Nowadays technology convergence is a huge trend with more functions being integrated into a single device. Similar happens to Apple Inc’s products that have been aggressively developed with more and more features added to be able to stand out from the crowd. And obviously, this trend seems to have gradually taken away its ‘traditional’ iPod series from the market space. One of the major reasons was due to its own hot selling iPhone and iPod touch that cannibalize its lower end iPod products such as nano, shuffle as well as classic series.

apple iphone

The situation is understandable as consumers are expecting a single device that can do everything and obviously, iPod series’ role as MP3 players no longer seems to be competitive. Instead of purchasing few gadgets individually, consumers rather spend more to get an all-in-one device that also simplifies the need to carry few gadgets while on the move. Regardless of what it is, Apple Inc is believed to still occupying 70 percent of MP3 players in this competitive market space.

The cannibalization is quite common especially in fast and dynamic market segments and another example is the giant chipmaker, Intel was also believed to have cannibalizing its entry level and middle range notebook processors sales with its famous Atom processors released into the market.


2 Responses to “Apple Inc’s iPhones and iPod Touch Cannibalizing iPod Nano, Shuffle and Classic Series”

  1. vga hdmi
    September 8th, 2009 13:39
    2

    I (and many people I know) have been using their phone – iPhone, or otherwise – as their primary MP3 player for a very long time now.Personally my last 3 phones have been my primary portable music player.

  2. iPhone 3G S lover
    July 27th, 2009 12:14
    1

    I am one of those people who want an all-in-one gadget. It saves me space on my pocket/hand bag. And it surey saves me the headache of locating one gizmo and another (as i can be topsy-turvy)at time. About Apples new gadgets, cannibalizing their ancient ones, well it’s about time! It’s a sign of progress. Besides, nothing in the world is permanent :-)

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to comments feature has been disabled. To receive notification of latest comments posted, subscribe to My Digital Life Comments RSS feed or register to receive new comments in daily email digest.
Custom Search

New Articles

Incoming Search Terms for the Article

ipod nano vs ipod touch - how many people own ipods 2009 - ipod nano vs. ipod touch - ipod nano vs. touch - cannibalization of apple - apple cannibalization - articles on cannibalization - ipod touch vs ipod nano - nano vs touch 2009 - ipod nano versus ipod touch - ipod touch competitive situation - live example of cannibalization - ipod nano vs ipod classic 2009,uk - market segment cannibalization example - motorola cannibazation - apple inc cannibilazition - ipod nano v.s ipod touch - apple inc competitive - cannibalizing USB HD - i-touch vs i-pod nano - ipod nano v ipod classic - apple product cannibalization - cannibalization of iphone and itouch - how many iphones and ipod touches have been sold? - ipod classic vs ipod touch - iphone cannibalize ipod - ipod cannibalization - nano vs classic 2009 - apple ipod nano market - CANNIBALIZATION ON IPHONE AND IPOD - iphone vs ipod classic 2009 - live business example of cannibalization - "IPod Nano vs IPod Touch" - ipod classic vs ipod nano - apple ipod nano cannibalize - how many iphones and ipod touches been sold - all - ipod classic vs. itouch - how many people own an ipod 2009 - nano v itouch - percentage of people who own an ipod - classic example of cannibalization products - How many people own Apple iPods? - how many people own an ipod + 2009 - how many people own an ipod nano 2009 - how many people own a apple nano - is apple inc in a competitive market - itouch vs. nano - nano v touch - product cannibalization articles -