Comments on: CES 2009: USB 3.0 Prototype Demo Not Meeting Expectation

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:20:09 +0000

Although I like the idea of faster usb transfer rates, and have no problem with 1320Mbps compared to current standards, I dont know if I can agree with calling it usb 3.0. More like 2.1 as it is closer to the jump from 1.0 to 1.1 than it is from 1.1 to 2.0.

By: tmc

tmc — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:39:35 +0000

Hopefully, we will only see ONE upgrade instead of two (as did USB 1.0 to 1.1). USB 2.0 vastly improved the 1.1 spec. 3.0 must rival that of SATA 600 or or be laughed out of the tech industry in adoption rates.

By: name

name — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:33:24 +0000

I wont take an half assed product. Bring some big changes and not any minor upgrades.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:34:47 +0000

USB 1/2.0.

By: Tim Brazer

Tim Brazer — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:12:29 +0000

I’ll take 1320Mbps any day over USB 2.0. I would definitely adopt a product with that kind of capacity.