<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Build 7004 Is Win7 Beta 2?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/</link>
	<description>Living Digitally and Electronically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:29:48 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 RC (Release Candidate) May Available in April 2009 &#187; My Digital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-563261</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 RC (Release Candidate) May Available in April 2009 &#187; My Digital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/?p=18042#comment-563261</guid>
		<description>[...] also likely to be the only beta for Windows 7 in early January. Since then, build 7004 (which is Beta2), build 7012, build 7015 and build 7016 of Windows 7 have been leaked to Internet, suggesting that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also likely to be the only beta for Windows 7 in early January. Since then, build 7004 (which is Beta2), build 7012, build 7015 and build 7016 of Windows 7 have been leaked to Internet, suggesting that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielRemains</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-558813</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielRemains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/?p=18042#comment-558813</guid>
		<description>lol.. NO
Will people understand that you can download the BETA 7000 from Microsoft??
The watermark shows build 7004 yeah..
But you know what? This can be hacked.. I already replaced the watermark with &#039;&#039;DanielRemains Windows 7 BETA&#039;&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol.. NO<br />
Will people understand that you can download the BETA 7000 from Microsoft??<br />
The watermark shows build 7004 yeah..<br />
But you know what? This can be hacked.. I already replaced the watermark with &#8221;DanielRemains Windows 7 BETA&#8221;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-556848</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/?p=18042#comment-556848</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very interesting considering Build 7004 is older than the current Public Beta which is Build 7000. I&#039;m sorry but you have been tricked into believing crap. Screensshot&#039;s of Builds 7015 and 7016 have already been leaked and if you had been listening at PDC Microsoft cleary said that there would be a Windows 7 Beta followed by a Release Candidate then RTM. If you&#039;ve ever used a Build of Windows 7 then it&#039;s very clear to see that the screenshot you&#039;ve been given is 100% fake. Oh dear...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very interesting considering Build 7004 is older than the current Public Beta which is Build 7000. I&#8217;m sorry but you have been tricked into believing crap. Screensshot&#8217;s of Builds 7015 and 7016 have already been leaked and if you had been listening at PDC Microsoft cleary said that there would be a Windows 7 Beta followed by a Release Candidate then RTM. If you&#8217;ve ever used a Build of Windows 7 then it&#8217;s very clear to see that the screenshot you&#8217;ve been given is 100% fake. Oh dear&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-552435</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/?p=18042#comment-552435</guid>
		<description>Actually, I received my &#039;Welcome to the Windows 7 &quot;Special&quot; Beta Opportunity&#039; the evening of January 7th, still downloading because my computer went to sleep while I was at work and didn&#039;t finish the download, so I don&#039;t know what build it is yet.  But the e-mail tells me it is Home Premium with Windows Anytime Upgrade to Ultimate (naturally they want the upgrade beta-tested).  I can&#039;t tell you anything more because there is a non-disclosure agreement in place.  But yes, the closed beta of Home Premium and Ultimate is assuredly in progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I received my &#8216;Welcome to the Windows 7 &#8220;Special&#8221; Beta Opportunity&#8217; the evening of January 7th, still downloading because my computer went to sleep while I was at work and didn&#8217;t finish the download, so I don&#8217;t know what build it is yet.  But the e-mail tells me it is Home Premium with Windows Anytime Upgrade to Ultimate (naturally they want the upgrade beta-tested).  I can&#8217;t tell you anything more because there is a non-disclosure agreement in place.  But yes, the closed beta of Home Premium and Ultimate is assuredly in progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-551758</link>
		<dc:creator>BT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/?p=18042#comment-551758</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, your source on Deviant Art is full of it. No one on the private (&#039;Closed&#039;) beta has received a build, and Beta 1 has not been released to testers yet. As such, there&#039;s currently nothing official as to whether or not there will be a second beta build, let alone what build number it is and/or when it will be released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, your source on Deviant Art is full of it. No one on the private (&#8217;Closed&#8217;) beta has received a build, and Beta 1 has not been released to testers yet. As such, there&#8217;s currently nothing official as to whether or not there will be a second beta build, let alone what build number it is and/or when it will be released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Beta Build 7004 (7004.0.081203-1830) Screenshot &#187; My Digital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/01/05/windows-7-build-7004-is-win7-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-551341</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Beta Build 7004 (7004.0.081203-1830) Screenshot &#187; My Digital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/?p=18042#comment-551341</guid>
		<description>[...] later than the speculated beta build of 7000, which is on December 12, 2008, and is said to be Windows 7 Beta2. It&#8217;s also hard to believe Microsoft decides to choose a older build as an beta, even though [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] later than the speculated beta build of 7000, which is on December 12, 2008, and is said to be Windows 7 Beta2. It&#8217;s also hard to believe Microsoft decides to choose a older build as an beta, even though [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
