ARM Core to Compete with X86 based Processor in Mobile Internet Device Market

Most of the smartphones or small portable internet devices are still powered by ARM core. Despite the recent launch of the Intel low power Atom processor, both Intel’s competitors, ARM and TI (Texas Instruments) are still confident enough to monopolize in PDA or smartphone segments. Not only that, both have stated that they are ready move a step further to conquer Mini PC market such as Asus Eee PC which was previously occupied only by X86 architecture processors.

Seems that while Intel is moving down to smartphone market where ARM core is still dominant, TI is trying to ramp up its market share in mini laptop market with the introduction of OMAP 3. No doubt, each of them has their own advantages and disadvantages. ARM based OMAP 3 is very power efficient, even much lower power as compared to current lowest power X86 based Intel Atom processor. In terms of OS (Operating systems) support, typically ARM based processor will run with Linux OS or some light OSs like Symbian or Windows Mobiles but it can’t enjoy the flexibility of getting those fancy Windows XP or even Vista running on them.

There is no clear cut of which core processor is winning as it is pretty much depends on what market segments they are targeting at. Nevertheless, if ARM can expand its software scalability with rich ecopartners support and have sufficient CPU headroom to run what is needed on mobile platform, it will definitely pose a huge threat to Intel’s Atom or even VIA’s Isaiah processors in terms of lower TDP and pricing requirement.


One Response to “ARM Core to Compete with X86 based Processor in Mobile Internet Device Market”

  1. Freescale Pushes ARM Core i.MX515 Processor into Netbook Market » My Digital Life
    January 6th, 2009 22:54
    1

    [...] we mentioned about ARM core competes with x86 based processor, now seems that Freescale, the Austin based semiconductor company has announced the new i.MX515, an [...]

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to comments feature has been disabled. To receive notification of latest comments posted, subscribe to My Digital Life Comments RSS feed or register to receive new comments in daily email digest.
Custom Search

New Articles

Incoming Search Terms for the Article

ARM x86 - arm vs x86 - arm x86 comparison - x86 vs arm - arm x86 benchmark - arm vs. x86 - arm vs x86 benchmark - cpu benchmark arm - x86 ARM - x86 and ARM - arm vs atom benchmark - comparison arm x86 - imx515 benchmark - ARM of X86 - arm vs x86 comparision - ARM and X86 processors - ATOM versus ARM OMAP processor benchmark - processor trend arm x86 - atom cpu benchmark omap - arm9 x86 comparison - ARM TDP - arm cpu laptop - ARM compared with x86 - x86 power desktop market share - migrating from x86 to arm processor - put windows xp on arm - arm to x86 converter - arm architecture x86 - i.mx515 vs omap - mobile processor comparison arm freescale - system power compare x86 arm - x86 to Arm - arm vs via processor - X86 and ARM - Atom Z510 vs omap - arm based vs x86 based - arm windows based pc - OMAP vs Atom - x86 arm processor - comparison intel arm - x86 & ARM processor - arm and x86 benchmark - omap vs snapdragon vs atom - competitors of arm processors - processor comparison arm - ARM processor compared to x86 processor - arm x86 compare - comparison arm vs x86 - Convert x86 to ARM -