Intel Atom Initial Benchmarking Data vs. Pentium and Celeron M Processors Before Official Release

Even before the public launch, the Germany based website known as ComputerBase has already announced the initial benchmarking data for Intel Atom processor. Intel Atom is the official name just released last week to replace Silverthorne code name as a new brand under Intel processors’ family. The silicon, fabricated using 45-nanometer process technology is famous for its ultra low power targeted for MID (Mobile Internet Device) and UMPC (Ultra Mobile PC).

intel_atom_benchmark.JPG

As per the Super PI result published on the website, the Atom processor was tested at 1.6GHz for single threaded application. It was ranked second, from the last, only a bit faster than the old Pentium M (Tualatin) running at 1.13GHz frequency. However, it was not able to compete with Celeron M (Dothan) although the chip was only clocking at 900 MHz frequency.

The performance was not as good as expected by some of the board manufacturers. One of the reasons could be due to the pre production sample that is still not optimized for benchmarking performance. Another reason is the benchmarking test was actually running on single threaded application whereby Atom is famous for its Hyper threading capability that could stand a great advantage when processing parallel threading tasks. In view of these, the data could serve as good reference during early stage but we should expect more better benchmarking results to be available in short future.


3 Responses to “Intel Atom Initial Benchmarking Data vs. Pentium and Celeron M Processors Before Official Release”

  1. Luis Haro
    April 24th, 2009 05:39
    3

    My heart is broken cuz now I know I’v been working with a Pentium3-like processor. :S I miss my macbook!! :’(

  2. 2009 - The Year of the Netbook (Not the Year of the Smartphone or MIDs) : Small Laptops and Notebooks
    January 27th, 2009 23:06
    2

    [...] a pure processing point of view, it’s a step back. Early last year, My Digital Life posted some benchmarks where Intel Atoms were compared to Celeron Ms, as well as some of the Pentium Ms that were [...]

  3. cappy
    March 9th, 2008 12:21
    1

    Wow… that’s really bad. Looks like Intel might be up to their old ways again, what with AMD not giving much of anything in the way of competition lately. -_-’

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to comments feature has been disabled. To receive notification of latest comments posted, subscribe to My Digital Life Comments RSS feed or register to receive new comments in daily email digest.
Custom Search

New Articles

Incoming Search Terms for the Article

Celeron 743 benchmark - intel su2300 benchmark - atom vs pentium 4 - celeron vs atom - intel atom vs pentium 4 - SU2300 benchmark - pentium m vs atom - celeron 743 vs atom - su2300 vs atom - atom vs celeron - atom vs pentium - atom vs pentium M - intel atom vs celeron - atom vs p4 - Celeron M 743 vs Atom - pentium 4 vs atom - intel atom vs pentium M - intel atom benchmark - celeron SU2300 benchmark - pentium atom - p4 vs atom - Intel Celeron 743 vs atom - intel atom vs pentium - pentium vs atom - atom vs celeron performance - intel atom vs p4 - intel celeron su2300 benchmark - intel celeron 743 benchmark - intel atom test - intel atom vs intel celeron - intel pentium m vs atom - atom performance comparison - celeron su2300 vs atom - celeron 743 performance - Intel Atom vs Celeron M - intel atom vs intel pentium - intel atom compared to pentium 4 - intel celeron vs atom - intel atom comparison - pentium m vs intel atom - celeron 743 atom - su2300 benchmarks - celeron vs. Atom - intel atom performance vs pentium 4 - Celeron 743 benchmarks - celeron m vs atom - benchmark intel atom - celeron m 743 benchmark - intel celeron vs intel atom - intel atom vs. pentium 4 -