<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Confirms Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 (RCR2) is RTM Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/</link>
	<description>Living Digitally and Electronically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:17:06 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 6001.18000.080118-1840 Standalone Offline Install Package BT Download &#187; My Digital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-583707</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 6001.18000.080118-1840 Standalone Offline Install Package BT Download &#187; My Digital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-583707</guid>
		<description>[...] and the documentation comes together with 6.0.6001.18000 (more detail 6001.18000.080118-1840) build version of SP1 RTM has clearly stated that it&#8217;s SP1 RC Refresh 2. Whether you want to believe it&#8217;s the RTM version of Vista SP1, this version has been assumed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the documentation comes together with 6.0.6001.18000 (more detail 6001.18000.080118-1840) build version of SP1 RTM has clearly stated that it&#8217;s SP1 RC Refresh 2. Whether you want to believe it&#8217;s the RTM version of Vista SP1, this version has been assumed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista SP1 Beta Program Is Complete! (RC Refresh 2 is RTM 18000) &#187; My Digital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-466861</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista SP1 Beta Program Is Complete! (RC Refresh 2 is RTM 18000) &#187; My Digital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-466861</guid>
		<description>[...] marking the ending of beta and release candidate testing phase. The email further confirming that Windows Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 with build version 6001.18000 is the valid RTM version with the same build numbers.  The email thanks the testers for the work on helping to test Vista [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] marking the ending of beta and release candidate testing phase. The email further confirming that Windows Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 with build version 6001.18000 is the valid RTM version with the same build numbers.  The email thanks the testers for the work on helping to test Vista [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Release Schedule Info for Vista SP1 Thru Windows Update &#187; My Digital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-466494</link>
		<dc:creator>Release Schedule Info for Vista SP1 Thru Windows Update &#187; My Digital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-466494</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 (SP1) through Windows Update (WU) in an email to TechNet subscribers. It further confirms that SP1 RC Refresh2 (RCR2) is indeed RTM version of SP1, and hints that probably English version of Vista can now get SP1 via Windows Update without [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 (SP1) through Windows Update (WU) in an email to TechNet subscribers. It further confirms that SP1 RC Refresh2 (RCR2) is indeed RTM version of SP1, and hints that probably English version of Vista can now get SP1 via Windows Update without [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista SP1 este gata! - Page 3 - Computer Games Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-464930</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista SP1 este gata! - Page 3 - Computer Games Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-464930</guid>
		<description>[...] asa l-am instalat eu, de 3 zile deja. Instructiuni complete aici si aici.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] asa l-am instalat eu, de 3 zile deja. Instructiuni complete aici si aici.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista SP1 RTM Released &#187; My Digital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-464862</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista SP1 RTM Released &#187; My Digital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-464862</guid>
		<description>[...] seems like Windows Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 is the version that RTM (Microsoft confirmed Vista SP1 RCR2 from WU is indeed RTM). Both has version build of 6001.18000.080118-1840. If you believe and bet that both are the same, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems like Windows Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2 is the version that RTM (Microsoft confirmed Vista SP1 RCR2 from WU is indeed RTM). Both has version build of 6001.18000.080118-1840. If you believe and bet that both are the same, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idiot_rickkins</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-464749</link>
		<dc:creator>idiot_rickkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-464749</guid>
		<description>I am a pirate from montreal canada and my Vista SP1 1840 works fine with the oem crack too.

if only my son would love a womand and not that 30 year old gay from toronto. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a pirate from montreal canada and my Vista SP1 1840 works fine with the oem crack too.</p>
<p>if only my son would love a womand and not that 30 year old gay from toronto. <img src='http://www.mydigitallife.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snuffy</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-464735</link>
		<dc:creator>Snuffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-464735</guid>
		<description>The fix was removed on some beta versions. but there are simply thousands of SP1-18000-1840 installs that have 15 days or less to activate.

My SP1 18000-1840 activated 100% perfect..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fix was removed on some beta versions. but there are simply thousands of SP1-18000-1840 installs that have 15 days or less to activate.</p>
<p>My SP1 18000-1840 activated 100% perfect..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idiot_rickkins</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-464733</link>
		<dc:creator>idiot_rickkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-464733</guid>
		<description>But that is not SP1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that is not SP1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-464725</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-464725</guid>
		<description>Not necessary. It probably will be implemented with WGA update or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessary. It probably will be implemented with WGA update or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idiot_rickkins</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/comment-page-1/#comment-464720</link>
		<dc:creator>idiot_rickkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/02/07/microsoft-confirms-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-2-rcr2-is-rtm-release/#comment-464720</guid>
		<description>so M$ was lying about the fix for the OEM bios hack in SP1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so M$ was lying about the fix for the OEM bios hack in SP1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
