<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best and Worst Microsoft Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/12/24/best-and-worst-microsoft-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/12/24/best-and-worst-microsoft-products/</link>
	<description>Living Digitally and Electronically</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:18 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/12/24/best-and-worst-microsoft-products/comment-page-1/#comment-494655</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/12/24/best-and-worst-microsoft-products/#comment-494655</guid>
		<description>My favorites:  Windows Server 2003, and of course, the two-button mouse!  There&#039;s also the Sidewinder Pro joystick series.  A possible future favorite:  The VPC and Unix subsystem support has the possibility of making Windows run Linux code natively, thus keeping Microsoft&#039;s market options open for the next big OS from Redmond.

My most hated products:  Windows Vista Win32/x32 (why bother? x64 and 4+GB RAM is reason to upgrade, though. heh), Windows ME.  Note how both of these are thought to be getting people ready for the next family of Windows.  Let&#039;s hope by 2010 that MS gets it&#039;s act together and makes a modular OS.

Just plain strange:  Windows update site when there&#039;s an Automatic Updates engine and the site doesn&#039;t like Mozilla anyways...  It&#039;s weird that they didn&#039;t just combine AU with WU already and make the site strictly for collecting patches ala AutoPatch for slipstreaming.  It has got to be a waste of effort and bandwidth all around.
Another strange thing is that you sometimes need updates, to use Windows Updates!  Catch 22 for a reinstalled OS without slipstreaming (say, off the original disk).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorites:  Windows Server 2003, and of course, the two-button mouse!  There&#8217;s also the Sidewinder Pro joystick series.  A possible future favorite:  The VPC and Unix subsystem support has the possibility of making Windows run Linux code natively, thus keeping Microsoft&#8217;s market options open for the next big OS from Redmond.</p>
<p>My most hated products:  Windows Vista Win32/x32 (why bother? x64 and 4+GB RAM is reason to upgrade, though. heh), Windows ME.  Note how both of these are thought to be getting people ready for the next family of Windows.  Let&#8217;s hope by 2010 that MS gets it&#8217;s act together and makes a modular OS.</p>
<p>Just plain strange:  Windows update site when there&#8217;s an Automatic Updates engine and the site doesn&#8217;t like Mozilla anyways&#8230;  It&#8217;s weird that they didn&#8217;t just combine AU with WU already and make the site strictly for collecting patches ala AutoPatch for slipstreaming.  It has got to be a waste of effort and bandwidth all around.<br />
Another strange thing is that you sometimes need updates, to use Windows Updates!  Catch 22 for a reinstalled OS without slipstreaming (say, off the original disk).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
