Comments on: Intel Nehalem Specification Comparison with AMD Core Architecture http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/10/31/intel-nehalem-specification-comparison-with-amd-core-architecture/ Living Digitally and Electronically Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:26:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Ulises Gomez http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/10/31/intel-nehalem-specification-comparison-with-amd-core-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-532565 Ulises Gomez Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:24:44 +0000 http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/10/31/intel-nehalem-specification-comparison-with-amd-core-architecture/#comment-532565 Well, it seems like intel wants to push customers for wait its product until issues in Nehalem could be corrected, beacuse there are several faults on Nehalem architecture which are still not corrected. And here some reasons for What Intel wants to push customers for wait Nehalem (delayed compared to Shangai): Intel's 6.4Gtransfer technology (Quickpath), can only transport 25BG/sec, against 6.4Gtransfer form Hyper Transport 3.1 which gives 52GB/sec (More than PCIe 2.0). Beacuse of the deficit in Quickpath technology, Intel needs to bost up it's performance enabling HyperThreading per core, and using larger cache sizes, which really gives advantage in processing capabilities over Shangai (inside the processor) but, what about when it needs to be tranfered again to RAM and across the network?, only a word to describe this: bottleneck. Well, it seems like intel wants to push customers for wait its product until issues in Nehalem could be corrected, beacuse there are several faults on Nehalem architecture which are still not corrected. And here some reasons for What Intel wants to push customers for wait Nehalem (delayed compared to Shangai):

Intel’s 6.4Gtransfer technology (Quickpath), can only transport 25BG/sec, against 6.4Gtransfer form Hyper Transport 3.1 which gives 52GB/sec (More than PCIe 2.0).

Beacuse of the deficit in Quickpath technology, Intel needs to bost up it’s performance enabling HyperThreading per core, and using larger cache sizes, which really gives advantage in processing capabilities over Shangai (inside the processor) but, what about when it needs to be tranfered again to RAM and across the network?, only a word to describe this: bottleneck.

]]> By: cssadc http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/10/31/intel-nehalem-specification-comparison-with-amd-core-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-400439 cssadc Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:42:06 +0000 http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/10/31/intel-nehalem-specification-comparison-with-amd-core-architecture/#comment-400439 what a great "NEWS"! hell when you have no info then write nothing. whats up with you guys? this info is out for ages.. nothing new..... and where is the comparisation... you suck.... what a great “NEWS”!

hell when you have no info then write nothing.
whats up with you guys? this info is out for ages.. nothing new….. and where is the comparisation… you suck….

]]>