Highest AntiTrust Penalty Against Telefonica
European Commission has commanded Telefonica, Spain’s telecommunications giant to pay Euro151.9 million (around USD206.5 million) over EU antitrust rules and regulations’ violation. Telefonica, the sixth largest service provider in the world is said to have monopolized the broadband service market by utilizing its advantageous position over its competitors.

The decision was made after accusation against Telefonica that it has set unreasonable high price on its broadband services since beginning in 2001. The effect is said to be huge that resulted in slow rollout of broadband Internet services in Spain, and subsequently affecting its economy growth as a whole. As compared to other Europe countries, Broadband rate in Spain is about 20 percent higher with penetration and growth of 20 to 30 percent slower. That could be the main reason that EU took action against Telefonica.
The fine is so far the highest against Telco companies after Microsoft antitrust penalty of Euro 280 million. It is expected to serve as a strong warning to other companies that may violate antitrust regulations and thus, the fine is more severe as compared to other antitrust sues against other Telcos previously. Some of the similar cases were Euro12.6 million and Euro10 million fines against Deutsche Telekom and France Telecom respectively.
Telefonica has argued that they are always in good act and complied with Spanish Telecommunication Market Commission’s regulations. And they would definitely appeal as they think this is “wholly unjustified and disproportionate” act against them!
Related Articles
- DOCOMO And Telefonica To Debut Toshiba TG01 Windows Mobile Phone
- Toshiba Announced Highest Resolution WQUXGA-W LCD Monitor
- Marvell Unveils 802.11n Wireless Chip with Highest Throughput of 450Mbps
- Casio Announced the Industry Highest Resolution 2-Inch LCD for Mobile Market
- Toshiba Unveiled 32GB Highest Memory Capacity NAND Flash Memory Devices for Consumer Markets
- Google Public Policy Blog
- Hacker Sentenced to Jail for Stealing VoIP Services
- How to Choose the Best Web Hosting
- NEC, Casio and Hitachi Joint Venture to Stay Competitively in Mobile Market
- Netbook Doubles the Growth Rate of Notebook Market










































July 26th, 2007 15:00
Lo justo o lo injusto en comercio es aplicado al sabor de quien se adjudica el derecho de aplicar la ley (su ley, entiendase bién). Es muy tipuco del los soberbios norteamericanos aplicar leyes en lugares ajenos a su juridicción, por ser tan inadecuados a la realidad quedan calificados como “no merecedores del grado de paladinos de la justicia” (ponemos como ejemplo Iraq y su gente, que murieron apenas por ser independientes economicamente y VENDER A QUIEN LES PLASCA EL PETROLEO, SU PETROLEO) Es así que no se deve tener en cuenta lo que los multadores propongan, y deve ser tomedo como una injusticia más, arquitectada por quien controla internet en los estados unidos para barrar su entrada en aquel pais. ridiculo pensar que los americanos esten pensando en justicia en otros paises, si lo unico que los afecta es el riesgo a sus propios negocios, el riesgo legitimo que sus propias empresas sufren por ser incompetentes y basar sus mercados apenas en logros politicos que sus armas garanten.