Making the Right Choice: LCD TV or Plasma TV?作出正確選擇：液晶電視或等離子電視？
Perhaps you are planning to get a new TV for yourself.也許你是規劃，以得到一個新的電視吧。 You might be looking at LCD TV (liquid crystal display) or a plasma TV and try to figure out what’s the difference between these two.你可能看的LCD TV （液晶顯示器） ，或等離子電視，並嘗試出來的區別是什麼在這兩者之間。
Both the Plasma and LCD have inherent strengths and weakness.無論是等離子和液晶顯示有內在的長處和弱點。 Physically, these two types of TV are quite similar.身體，這兩類電視十分相似。 Both of them offer very thin panel-like shapes with the LCD just a little thinner than the plasma.他們都提供了非常薄的面板一樣的形狀與液晶顯示器只是一個小更薄，比血漿。 However, they employ different technology in an attempt to deliver similar results.然而，他們採用不同的技術在試圖提供類似的結果。 So, which TV is better?因此，電視是更好嗎？ 
Technically, there are no simple straightforward answers in term of which is better.在技術上，有沒有一個簡單的直截了當的答案，任期是更好。 Both have their advantages and disadvantages.都有其優點和缺點。 For instance, the LCD TV is generally lighter for any given size and it is also cooler to operate.舉例來說，液晶電視普遍較輕，為任何特定的大小和它也是涼的運作。 It generates less heat compared to the Plasma TV.它所產生的熱量較少相比，等離子電視。 The LCD TV might be a better choice if you intend to wall mount your TV as it is lighter and more secure.液晶電視可能是一個更好的選擇，如果你打算壁掛型您的電視，因為這是更輕，更安全可靠。 Having said that, LCD TV loses out in terms of size as a purchasing factor.話雖如此，液晶電視失去了在條款的大小作為一個購買因素。 Larger screen sizes are available for Plasma TV.較大的屏幕尺寸可供等離子電視。 It easily reaches 65 inches and more.它很容易達到六十五英寸和更多。 The LCD TV is catching up in this disadvantage by trying to come out with larger screen TVs.液晶電視是趕上了在這不利的嘗試走出來與大屏幕電視。 In terms of cost, an LCD TV is more expensive than a Plasma TV of similar size.在成本，液晶電視是較昂貴的比等離子電視類似的大小。
The Plasma TV has better contrast ratio and colour details such as colour accuracy and saturation.等離子電視有更好的對比度和色彩的細節，例如顏色的準確性和飽和度。 It also has a better viewing angle compared to LCD TV.它也有一個更好的視角相比，液晶電視。 The LCD TV generally produces brighter pictures and has a better advantage in its native resolution.液晶電視普遍產生美好的圖片和具有較好的優勢，在其本土的決議。 Regardless of size, all LCD TVs come with native high definition resolutions compared to Plasma TV.不論大小，所有的液晶電視來與本土高清晰度的決議相比，等離子電視。 The resolution of a standard LCD TV model is usually of 1,366 by 768 pixels or 1,280 by 720 pixels compared to a budget plasma TV which is only 800 by 480 pixels only.該決議一個標準的液晶電視模型通常是由1366年的768像素或1280年由720像素相比，預算等離子電視，其中只有800 480像素只。 The high-end models of LCD TV can even have up to 1,920 by 1,080 pixel resolution.高的高端型號的液晶電視甚至可以高達1920 ，由1080年的分辨率。
In terms of motion tracking, Plasma TVs has a better advantage.在條款的議案，跟踪，等離子電視具有較好的優勢。 Some LCD screens tend to have blur images especially during fast moving scenes in sports or movies.有些液晶顯示器往往有模糊的圖像，尤其是在快速移動的場面，在體育或電影。 On the other hand, Plasma TV might sometimes suffer from screen burn problems.在另一方面，等離子電視，有時可能會受到屏幕燒傷的問題。 Screen burn-in occurs when an image is left too long on a screen and results in a ghost of that image being burned in permanently.屏幕燒傷，在發生時，一個形象是離開太久，在一個屏幕上和結果，在鬼的形象被焚毀，在永久。 However, this problem has been gradually overcome in the latest Plasma TVs.不過，這個問題已逐漸克服在最新的等離子電視。 Newer Plasma TVs are less susceptible due to the improved technology.較新的等離子電視是不易由於該技術的改進。
LCD TVs have an edge in terms of power consumption.液晶電視有優勢，在電力消費。 LCD TVs generally can save up to 30 percent power usage compared to Plasma TVs.液晶電視一般可以節省高達30 ％的用電量相比，等離子電視。 LCD TVs have longer life spans in comparison to Plasma TVs.液晶電視有較長的壽命比較，以等離子電視。 Compared to LCD TVs, Plasma TVs have altitude problems.相比，液晶電視，電漿電視有高度的問題。 Plasma TVs do not perform as well at higher altitudes.等離子電視的不執行，以及在更高的高度。 This problem doesn’t exist for LCD TVs.這個問題不存在，因為LCD電視。
Both LCD TV and Plasma TV have their advantages and disadvantages over each other.雙方的液晶電視和等離子電視有其優點和缺點超過對方。 Of course, the last factor to consider is still the budget in your pocket!當然，最後的考慮因素仍是預算在您的口袋！
IMPORTANT : This is a machine translated page which is provided "as is" without warranty. 重要說明 ：這是一個機器翻譯網頁是“按原樣”提供的擔保。 Machine translation may be difficult to understand.機器翻譯可能很難理解。 Please refer to請參閱 original English article原來的英語文章 whenever possible.只要有可能。
Share and contribute or get technical support and help at分享和貢獻，或取得技術的支持和幫助，在 My Digital Life Forums 我的數字生活論壇 . 。
Related Articles相關文章
- World’s Largest TV?世界上最大的電視？
- Cool USB Plasma Ball涼爽的USB血漿球
- New Plasma TV Power Regulation Proposed For Australian Market新的等離子電視的功率調節提出了澳洲市場
- New Samsung 3D-Ready Plasma TV Boasting 1000000:1 Contrast Ratio新三星三維準備就緒，等離子電視擁有對比度1000000:1
- World Largest LCD TV: Sharp’s 108-Inch世界上最大的液晶電視：夏普的108英寸
- How NOT to Ship a HDTV如何不船一高清晰度電視
- New Record for the World’s Largest TV新紀錄，為世界上最大的電視
- Global Gadget Mania全球工具躁狂症
- Samsung HP-S4253 42-inch HD Plasma TV Review by Sci-Tech Today三星，惠普- s4253 42英寸高清等離子電視檢討，由科技今天
- Philips 50-Inch Plasma HDTV Reviews飛利浦50英寸等離子HDTV的評語
March 19th, 2007 10:02 2007年3月19日10時02分
One thing I can tell you is that if you live above approx.一件事，我可以告訴你的是，如果你住以上的約。 6,500ft sea level, LCD is your only choice.六五〇 〇英尺海平面，液晶顯示器是你唯一的選擇。 Plasma TV’s, because of some interaction with the gas envelope that I only vaguely understood, tend to buzz and burn out in weeks or months at high altitude.等離子電視的，因為一些互動與煤氣信封，我只含糊地理解，往往言論和燒傷，在幾個星期或幾個月在高海拔地區。 I found this out in Santa Fe when the Best Buy salesman made sure I wasn’ta Los Alamos resident before selling me a plasma TV.我發現這一點，在聖塔菲時， Best Buy的推銷員作出肯定我不是洛斯阿拉莫斯駐地前，出售我一個等離子電視。
PS for my money plasma is still much better than LCD in matching price ranges.保安局常任秘書長我的錢血漿仍是遠優於液晶顯示器在匹配的價格範圍。
March 20th, 2007 23:21 2007年3月20日23時21分
Well even after eading this rticle,i am nable to justify which to buy.i read this blog and the prices are in Rs can i know in dollars price sof lcds以及即使在主導，這第，我nable的理由，其中以buy.i閱讀此博客和價格都在盧比可我知道在美元價格特種部隊液晶顯示器
http://hdtvindia.blogspot.com
March 21st, 2007 23:10 2007年3月21日23時10分
Power consumption LCD vs Plasma:功率消耗液晶顯示器與等離子：
The article is not correct about power consumption differences between plasma and LCD.文章是不正確的關於電力消費之間的差異等離子和液晶顯示。 The article is probably based on the manufacturers quoted numbers (which deserves a foot note) the consumption of an LCD display is constant and will not change in relation of the displayed image (the manuf.quoted numbers are in this case the min.,max and average consumption) A plasma screen will consume less power when the displayed image is dark and more when light, The quoted figure is the maximum power consumption.文章可能是的基礎上，製造商所引述的數字（值得一英尺注）的消費1液晶顯示器是常數和不會改變的關係在所顯示的圖像（ manuf.quoted號碼是在這種情況下，民，最高和平均消費）等離子顯示屏將消耗較少的功率時，所顯示的圖像是黑暗，更當輕，所引述的數字是最高的功率消耗。 In daily usage the difference between lcd and plasma is very little.在日常使用之間的差異LCD和等離子是很少的。
Below the results of a test done in Germany:下面的結果，測試做在德國：
Test done by AVt.op messtechnic in Germany, they tested a panasonic 42px60 plasma, LG 42LC2R LCD, Philips 42PF7621D LCD, Sony 40s200 LCD and a Samsung LE40R71B LCD.測試所做的avt.op messtechnic在德國，他們測試了42px60松下等離子， LG電子42lc2r液晶顯示器，飛利浦42pf7621d液晶顯示器，索尼40s200 LCD和三星le40r71b液晶顯示器。 They measured the total energy consumed watching movies from DVD他們來衡量的總能源消耗量看電影從DVD
Result watching 6 days, 7 nights (German version) (This is a movie that is quiet bright)結果看六天，七夜（德語版） （這是一個電影是安靜的光明）
1. 1 。 LG 42″ LCD 200.10 Wh LG電子42 “液晶200.10褔利
2. 2 。 Sony 40″ LCD 208.60 Wh索尼40 “液晶208.60褔利
3. 3 。 Philips 42″ LCD 218.90 Wh飛利浦42 “液晶218.90褔利
4. 4 。 Panasonic 42″ Plasma 230.40 Wh松下42 “等離子230.40褔利
5. 5 。 Samsung 40″ LCD 239.20 Wh三星40 “液晶239.20褔利
Result watching X-Men (A rather dark movie)結果看X戰警（一，而不是黑暗的電影）
1. 1 。 Panasonic 42″ Plasma 200.80 Wh松下42 “等離子200.80褔利
2. 2 。 LG 42″ LCD 205.70 Wh LG電子42 “液晶205.70褔利
3. 3 。 Sony 40″ LCD 213.80 Wh索尼40 “液晶213.80褔利
4. 4 。 Philips 42″ LCD 224.60 Wh飛利浦42 “液晶224.60褔利
5. 5 。 Samsung 40″ LCD 246.70 Wh三星40 “液晶246.70褔利
The Sony and Samsung were 2″ smaller then the rest of the screens but they could not take advantage of this fact.在索尼公司和三星公司分別為2 “較小的話，其餘的屏幕上，但他們不能利用這個事實。 (The Samsung actually preformed the worse in both movies) （三星，其實預製壞在這兩個電影）
June 15th, 2008 03:18 2008年6月15日3時18分
On my Sony 46″ LCD TV, the backlight on the maximum setting uses 100 watts more than the backlight on the mininimum setting (237 watts vs 137 watts).我的索尼46 “液晶電視， 背光上的最高設置使用100瓦以上的背光就mininimum設置 （ 237瓦特與一百三十七瓦特） 。 My Kill-a-Watt also says my Sharp 26″ LCD TV showed a similar correlation between the backlight setting and energy usage.我殺死一瓦特也說，我的夏普26 “液晶電視顯示了類似的相關性之間的背光設置和能源的使用。 The Sony 46″ LCD TV has a Power Saving setting which reduces energy usage to 87 watts (instead of 137 watts), though the picture is pretty dim in Power Saving mode.索尼46 “液晶電視具有節電設置從而降低能源用量至87瓦（而不是137瓦特） ，雖然圖片是相當暗淡，在省電模式。 No other picture settings other than backlight had any effect on the power usage.沒有其他圖片設置以外的背光有任何影響對電力的使用。